![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
| |
UNA-Canada Fact Sheets > Canada and the UN - The Process of Revitalization and Re-definition
"There is no question that world peace is still a UN objective... but issues such ashuman rights, the environment, health and disarmament have also come to the forefront. In the years ahead, we will need the UN more than ever. The critical question is the direction the UN will take. We as Canadians have an opportunity to influence that direction and to contribute to the revitalization of the UN." Michael Oliver, Past President of UNA-Canada Changing Times, Changing Needs When global leaders met in San Francisco to form the United Nations
over 50 years ago, the world was emerging from the horrors of the Second
World War. After such devastation, it was natural for international
peace and security to be the driving concern and overriding priority
of the newly formed world body. Focused as they were on creating a lasting
peace, few leaders anticipated the East-West polarity of the Cold War
which hampered the ability of the UN to perform its operations. The 50th Anniversary: A Time for Reflection and Recommendations The UN's 50th anniversary in 1995 was a time to celebrate the accomplishments
and ideals of the United Nations. It was also a time for reflection,
a time to focus on how the UN could be improved to meet the needs of
all people. In this light, Canada and its fellow UN members were asked
to participate in the ongoing process of examining the UN's efforts
and providing recommendations on how the organization's operations could
be improved. In a time of revolutionary change, great promise, and extraordinary
challenge, efforts are being taken to redefine and revitalize the role
of the United Nations for the coming millennium. Security Council: The Security Council, the only UN organization capable of passing resolutions that bind member states, is the most powerful UN organ. The Council's permanent membership, however, no longer reflects the reality of global power. Furthermore, it lacks credibility as an impartial body because of the disproportional representation of rich Northern states. Suggested reforms to improve representation, and thereby the legitimacy of the Council, include increasing the number of Security Council members, supporting the principle of a fixed proportion of Council seats from the South, and making the expansion of the permanent membership contingent upon adding permanent seats for the South. Further reforms should include reducing the significance of the veto power possessed by permanent members. Finance: Unlike Canada, many states do not pay their regular membership or peacekeeping dues to the UN (for a number of reasons). This has placed the UN in a precarious financial situation that is threatening its activities. Article 19 of the UN Charter states that members two years in arrears should lose their voting rights. One reform should be the enforcement of this article, thereby encouraging states to pay their dues. UN expenditures have also been a problem, leading to charges of inefficiency, mismanagement, and, in extreme cases, fraud within the UN. To improve the situation, an Auditor-General, responsible to and appointed by the General Assembly, should be appointed, while an internal management review system, accountable to the Secretary-General, should be implemented. An Agenda for Peace: Intra-state crises were not addressed in the UN Charter. Recent humanitarian crises in areas such as Rwanda, the former Yugoslavia, and Somalia have raised a number of complex questions regarding whether the UN has the authority to intervene in humanitarian disasters, and if it does have this authority, whether it should use it. A further question concerns how the UN could intervene effectively. The Committee recommended that the Canadian government press for, and contribute troops to, a heavily armed UN rapid reaction force to perform such tasks as protecting humanitarian relief work, securing cease-fire lines, and preventing the escalation of conflicts in order to prevent (or diminish the scale of) future humanitarian disasters. Arms Proliferation: Regional arms races and the international trade in arms are causes of great instability. Therefore, the UN's Register of Conventional Arms should be strengthened, and political settlements and agreements on arms controls should be pursued in order to reduce the arms trade and improve global security. An Agenda for Development: The UN has achieved a great deal in the economic and social sphere over the last 50 years. Critics, however, point out that there is a duplication of work, limited responsiveness, and a lack of accountability within the UN's development sphere. Fifty percent of African children suffer from malnutrition, and the income gap between the richest 20 percent and poorest 20 percent of the world's population has doubled from 30:1 to 61:1 in the past 30 years. These facts indicate the need for reform to improve the UN's development efforts. One principal recommendation to improve the situation was to create a Sustainable Development Security Council, a high-level decision-making body within the UN, with the power to coordinate the UN's specialized agencies. An Agenda for Human Rights: While the UN membership is composed
of states, many of its goals were meant to promote human values. The
two have not always been compatible, and many states have found it to
be in their interests to maintain a weak human rights system under the
UN. A number of UN human rights organs have evolved to monitor states'
adherence to human rights standards, but the manner in which the system
evolved has led to a lack of coordination and rational division of labour.
These and other problems have resulted in inefficient and often ineffective
efforts to protect human rights. To improve the situation, an early
warning system should be developed in coordination with UN agencies
such as the High Commissioner for Human Rights and the High Commissioner
for Refugees. There should be a greater coordination of functions between
the UN's specialized agencies and the Secretariat. A programme should
be established under the High Commissioner for Human Rights to ensure
an effective field presence when human rights are, or are in danger
of, being violated, in order to provide better information to the international
community and to deter abuse. Obstacles to UN Reforms Reforming the UN, however, is not a simple task. While members agree
on the need for reform, few members agree on exactly what types of reform
are required. Permanent members of the Security Council, for example,
do not want to weaken their veto power, and are therefore extremely
unlikely to support veto reforms. States pushing for a less interventionary
United Nations will not support reforms by those who desire a more interventionary
organization. National interests will often lead states to oppose reforms
to the United Nations. Reforms to the United Nations will be largely
based on consensus, and, as such, reformation is likely to be a slow
process. Reformation could take the form of fundamental change or essentially
cosmetic rearrangement. While this may be discouraging in the short
term, it is encouraging that the international community agrees change
is needed, and is actively involved in examining what might be done
to improve the UN. A copy of "Canadian Priorities for United Nations Reform: Proposals for Policy Changes by the United Nations and the Government of Canada" is available for a nominal charge from UNA-Canada. Please contact the United Nations Association in Canada at 309 Cooper Street, Suite 300, Ottawa, Ontario, K2P 0G5, tel.: 1-613-232-5751, fax: 1-613-563-2455, e-mail: info@unac.org for more details. |